InnTherapy

InnTherapy - Willow Bunch College - Vate Ed Campus

Unfortunately the health techniques were somehow lost as a profession, probably due to their relative simplicity and that the interpretive and therapeutic techniques were not really understood (scanty texts and limited or non-existent reading skills were a likely problem along with bureaucratization and religious interferences).

Therapy comes in many formats, styles and approaches, directly or indirectly health related (or in some cases, distantly related). Many therapies now are only available via medically trained people, while others are within the control of specially trained therapists. Some fall into areas of other health related disciplines. Therapies are often controlled by government agencies (such as Health Canada, or the US FDA) when specific levels of competence and training are required, or if related therapeutic equipment is defined as a medical device, or entails consuming, inserting or injecting a product into a person. The bureaucracy behind government control is aimed to protect the patient, however what it really does is protect the medical profession (with its 55% success rate) so no one except them and their associated profession can take responsibility for healing anyone.

"Diagnostic criteria" designates the combination of known symptoms to allow someone properly trained to recognize ailments and to ascertain the diagnosis of the respective disease(s). The medical profession is the best known profession which does this. Several others do this (or claim to do this). Other individuals or professions are usually not as well trained nor do they have as many diagnostic tools. The other named, and taught, health systems include Chinese acupuncture/acupressure, Tibetan, Ayurvedic, Unani, Allopathic, Naturopathic, Chiropractic and Homeopathic. Certainly others existed, everyone needs health care. Each of these other forms of health care use herbs (the medical profession now only uses expensive pharmaceuticals). The alternative health providers also use various diagnostics and therapies (some procedures and therapies are effective, although by percentage the medical system presently has a greater effectiveness). Indigenous health care follows largely along a non-invasive and herbalistic path too.

Typically, someone with abnormal symptoms will consult a health professional, who will then obtain a history of the patient's symptoms and examine them for current signs of disease. The health professional formulates a hypothesis of likely diagnoses (and within the medical profession may obtain or recommend further testing to confirm or clarify the diagnosis) before providing treatment. Most forms of testing beyond observation and educated guesses tend to add a cost and may be subject to considerable expense (and profit) by health practitioners. The medical profession has in a number of countries with healthier economies created a guild or union which 'controls' or manipulates governments to ensure their guild's continuing control of health practices, and profits. Judging from the high cost of health care and hospital billings in the USA a large percentage of medical doctors, yet not all, have profit in view rather than the wellbeing of their clients. Another problem exists that keeps the cost of health care high under the present (western) medical system, and that is the number of doctors being trained is always so low that there is a chronic shortage of qualified medical doctors.

In Armagh, Ireland 650 years BC was the world's first hospital. Westernized (scientific) medicine points to their origins, with Asclepius in temples of healing on the island of Kos, Greece 300 years BC, and on Malta and other Mediterranean islands. Then the process of diagnostics and appropriate therapy was then closely related to the use of dreams and visions for the diagnosis, and remediation too. The same process or some variation of it is still used widely in indigenous communities by medicine men, traditional healers, shamans, kahunas or kemantans. Their success rate varies depending on whether they use the same method or not.

Herbalists in western countries and many pharmaceutical corporations have used some of the same information as these non-medical health personnel. Few herbalists work with the same form of diagnosing. Most simply know what herbs work for what ailments. It is highly unlikely any of them have a working knowledge of all the many thousands of useful medicinal herbs that exist. China and India both list in the order of 7000 medicinal plants, and neither have a complete inventory of the world's entire range of medicinal plants, no one does, let alone a complete guide to what they do and how to use them. (Providing this encyclopedic information is part of our mandate and will be expanded on in www.newhortus.com in the near future and tie in a literacy program to help the bottom billion, many of whom are the indigenous peoples of the world, the same peoples whose languages, cultures and knowledge are threatened due to assimilation.)

Diagnosis and therapy, then and now, is only as good as the person interpreting the information, and the proper application of any therapeutic processes used. We know from the use of this diagnostic and remedial process, with more than 7000 clients by Edgar Cayce in Virginia Beach, that this method of diagnosis and remediation has an extremely high percentage of success (99+%), almost double the medical profession's success with their superior levels of training and scientific approaches.

Edgar Cayce’s health suggestions, supplied to him by God via visioning, cost far less. While Cayce’s use of this diagnostic approach helped clients, the business of making this health process more widely available didn’t grow well. His helpful method remained an ‘also ran’ not because it didn’t work, but due in part to the low levels of financial remuneration and support it generated. Therefore it didn't serve as many people as it could have as it didn't get into the right hands and was considered an oddity or anomaly rather than a health method to emulate (powerful people including doctors worked against it as it was perceived to threaten their control over the health system even then, not add a diagnostic and remediation tool to their 'bag of tricks').

There's an important parallel to be drawn in the medical profession’s non-acceptance. It is that of other God-aided improvements aimed at humanity. What happens is that the visionary people or prophets who provide them, fail to adequately explain the (ease of and) necessity for using dreams and visions, and fail to get enough support for using the 'keys to kingdom'. (Our use of dreams and visions always keeps any direction we are given by the Creator close to what the Creator intended, once we understand how the communication works. The informed and educated who adopt a visionaries 'program' early, have in the past invariably managed to corrupt it with their inability and opinions and always turn it into something less).

The exact same thing occurs with religion. A prophet foresees and shows the benefits. Supporters take it and run, yet often at a tangent to the direction provided so within a generation or two the benefit and use is but a faint shadow of what was given and the idea of learning to use dreams and visions increasingly remote. Jesus taught the use of dreams and visions for healing and foresight. Note the number of places of worship that place any value on that now and you see what the effects of religion are on his teaching.

The Celts and Greeks used a God-given means of obtaining health. The political and elitist bureaucrats within the system didn't want to work with that. They wanted a 'cleaner', more logic based method, easier to use 'scientifically' and procedurally, something the elite could control (and 'own'). They got it, by providing explanations to justify their opinionated views that were filled with clichés, truisms and half-truths.

The bureaucrats dropped the 'per use' connection to God (because it too had a user fee or cost, from people who weren’t always as knowledgeable, clever or educated as they were). They also failed to keep good records of past successes so comparisons between dream and vision inspired diagnoses and cures were not possible. As a result the cost for health care increased hugely, the medical profession’s effectiveness has increased to nearly half of what gentle and sensitive visionaries can do, yet only some ailments remained treatable with no one remembering how it was possible in the past to treat almost any ailment or disease.

We accept less than quality results when there is no alternative, yet there has always been an alternative health system far better than the commonly ‘accepted’ one. It wasn’t organized and became obscured by doctors who wanted top billing. Pretenders, opinionated charlatans and the inept stepped in. Yet visionaries still exist. Their talents aren’t in doubt. Most people can learn how to use the ability. So the real question is ‘do we want affordable health care or to be held to ransom by bureaucrats and a guild who control health care’?

According to UN’s WHO 80% of the world rely on plants as their first access to health care gives most of the answer. Natural plant substances generate more than $75 billion in sales each year for the pharmaceutical industry, $20 billion in herbal supplement sales, and around $3 billion in cosmetics sales, according to a study by the European Commission. (The Americans spent $154 billion on pharmaceuticals last year.) By 2004 thirty-six percent of adults in the United States used some form of complementary and alternative medicine. That amount of spending if distributed to the most impoverished 10% could mean $.50 a day income to every indigenous person in the world, or at least a 50% increase in their average income.

"In medicine one must pay attention not to plausible theorizing, but to experience and reason together". Hippocrates. Yet modern medicine abandoned its origins of using dreams and visions, aside from the occasional nod, and relies now entirely on books, often outdated and biased experience, pharmaceutical reports that are less than factual, plus, unfortunately, a lot of bad science, deliberate oversights, fraudulent reports, errors and omissions. Theorizing is impossible with information that has been presented as facts from researchers who have sacrificed their integrity for paid results that a pharmaceutical company, or a medical manufacturer, want. The utmost integrity is needed when other's lives are in the balance not paternalistic systems and obstructive bafflegab. The number of deaths in the USA per year, where the medical community reigns, due to a variety of failures is a testimony to a system of health that is seriously flawed, corrupt and incapable of providing health care they profess to be capable of supplying. No method is flawless. Theirs is not remotely close. A million people die in the USA per year due to problems, errors and deficiencies created by the medical community, from doctors on down.

We might want to note the success rate of medical doctors in assessing their own expertise:

Health care providers get everything right in 55 per cent of cases… (International) Best Doctors has a database of 50,000 physicians in 40 specialties. It takes an average of four to six weeks for a Best Doctor to confirm or amend a diagnosis… Best Doctors changes the diagnosis 22 per cent of the time, and alters treatment 61 per cent of the time. But mercifully In 67.3 per cent of cases, patients avoid invasive treatment, and they save $21,689 average per case reduction of inappropriate medical costs. click the link above to see more of these articles from www.bestdoctors.com website. Apparently they had not read the 6 page article at http://www.lef.org/magazine/mag2004/mar2004_awsi_death_01.htm or even cared enough to examine the unacceptably high levels of failure their profession imposes on its many victims. They even make claims to 'own' the words diagnose, remedy, cure, etc. so other professions cannot use them. With a 55% success rate it is time they woke up to the reality they have no exclusive rights to the ability, words or much of anything when Edgar Cayce had a 99% success rate at remediating health problems, with no medical training. His success was not a fluke or anomaly, the ability can be learned.

We might ask Best Doctors how the 2/3s of the world's population who make $2/day or less (if it were in cash rather than trade) would pay for health care seeing a SAVING of that magnitude would take the poorly paid 30+ years to earn even if they had no living expenses. We can safely say from Best Doctor's own statements that medical services are for the moneyed elite, not for the average person. Yet the medical doctor's guild increasingly positions itself to control or limit everyone's access to health care even while a significant percentage of people living in the USA cannot afford basic health care. In the USA health care is not universal right like in many other nations. Within the medical system are highly positioned bureaucrats who want no competition except others who will keep the cost for health care high and two thirds of American doctors are specialists, meaning they aren't interested in general practice, looking after normal needs.

You might also ask how much saving is truly being passed on to the health insurance programs? In Canada we do not see what amount the doctor is billing or know what the overall effect of their billing will be to us as taxpayers. This non-transparency leads to institutionalized abuse and higher taxes to support it. Unlike the Americans we don't know what we are paying to have health care.

It also leaves the majority of people in industrialized nations erroneously believing the highly paid medical system is the only path to health care even though doubt as to their success and very high cost has been noted. Yet the westernized medical system continues to protect their ‘turf’ from people who are less trained in health related areas so they alone remain well-paid for their larger knowledge and excessively restricted access to remedies. (Medical doctors are known to misuse their 'godlike' position and amongst them are doctors who kill far too many people with their misdiagnoses and misapplication of appropriate care. Yet medical doctors alone are permitted to use most of the high priced scientific, surgical and technological remedies). In most cases that high level of knowledge, training and technology is excessive for the majority of ailments. We could praise their many successes, however when lives are lost to a variety of errors, praise would barely escape our lips.

Far too many people cannot afford the medical health system. At least 15% of people in the biggest wealthy nation (USA) have no health insurance and at least 15% more have inadequate insurance (and their HMOs have found they can cheat people by denying claims to repayment on flimsy excuses and get away with their crimes). Yet everyone needs access to appropriate health care. The medical profession's 'solution' leaves the majority of people no option but to accept the rapidly increasingly and expensive medical health system they cannot afford, even though a medical approach to health has a clearly lower success rate than properly applied vision and dream based methods.

A very high percentage of health care funding (from taxes and insurances) goes to pay the high billings this guild controls and justifies to itself and bureaucrats. All other health forms are left to bill the recipients directly. Is there something wrong with a process that allows one guild to claim all the funds? Where's the competition? Competition between members of the same guild isn't real competition. The public is not being properly served.

We also fully expect bureaucrats within the medical profession will, at some point, attempt to stop us through the courts of law rather than take the time to learn how to do what the earliest members of their profession originally did. Do they hate competitors more than they love learning, and think they alone own all rights to providing health care? They don't have all the rights. People have choices, certainly in democracies. We do not intend on hiding what we do from them and will gladly invite them to join so they too can learn to use the same ability that has been 'lost' for so long: we don't expect many will join us initially. Some would sooner fight having anyone encroach on 'their' money machine and will want governments and courts to protect their right to be the only recognized and funded health service.

Donating or prepaying via buying a $500 or $1000 bond on www.buyorsell.it will help us complete the furnishing of the (25,000 sqft) 2369 sqm facility we fully own, hire therapeutic neuroscientists and perfect the healing methods used so long ago. Why do we use this approach? The existing sources of funding and grants will not consider funding what we do. Their system of funding protects their guild even in this.